Thinking Healthy - John Julian

Understanding Ourselves

A Note About These Articles

Understanding ourselves is often the first step towards change, but understanding alone rarely creates lasting change. Most of us have known for years that we should worry less, be kinder to ourselves, communicate more openly or manage stress differently. The challenge is not usually a lack of information. It is learning how to translate insight into everyday life. These articles are intended to support that first step. My hope is that they help you better understand yourself, your relationships and some of the common challenges we all face. Sometimes a single idea or a different way of looking at a situation can bring considerable relief. At other times, it simply helps us ask better questions.

Reading, however, is different from counselling. A book or article cannot ask you questions, notice your unique patterns, help you explore what lies beneath your experiences, or adapt its ideas to your particular circumstances. Counselling provides something different: a safe, collaborative relationship in which new ways of thinking, feeling and responding can be explored, practised and gradually integrated into everyday life.

Many people tell me they have an "aha" moment while reading one of these articles. Insight is valuable. Counselling helps transform that insight into understanding, practice and lasting change.

If these articles prove helpful, I am delighted. If they also leave you wanting to explore your own experiences more deeply, I would be pleased to work with you.

Safety and Safeness

Many people come to counselling because they want to feel safe. They hope that if they can solve enough problems, reduce enough stress or gain enough certainty, they will finally be able to relax.

Yet many discover something surprising.

Even when life becomes objectively safer, they still feel anxious, tense or unable to settle.

Why?

Because safety and safeness are not the same thing.

Safety is about protection from danger. It asks questions such as: Am I safe? Am I at risk? What could go wrong? Our brains evolved to answer these questions because recognising danger helped our ancestors survive.

Safeness is something different. It is an embodied experience (how you physically feel) rather than simply an external circumstance. It is the feeling that, in this moment, life is okay. It is the experience of being able to relax, think clearly, connect with others and simply be yourself without constantly preparing for threat.

Safeness develops through relationships characterised by warmth, trust, kindness, reliability and belonging. Over time, these experiences teach the nervous system that it does not always need to remain on high alert. From this foundation, curiosity, learning, creativity, compassion and emotional wellbeing can flourish.

Many people today live in environments that are physically safer than at almost any other time in history, yet they experience chronic stress, anxiety, loneliness and exhaustion. Modern life often keeps our threat systems activated through constant demands, uncertainty, information overload and social pressures, even when there is no immediate danger.

For this reason, counselling is not only about helping people become safer. It is also about helping them rediscover experiences of safeness. Through a supportive therapeutic relationship, together with practices such as mindfulness, self-compassion and other approaches that help regulate the nervous system, many people find that their body and mind gradually learn to settle. As this happens, resilience grows, thinking becomes clearer and life begins to feel more manageable.

This distinction is also reflected in many contemplative traditions. In qigong, practitioners cultivate what is known as song (pronounced soong)—a state of relaxed, alert ease in which unnecessary tension is gradually released while remaining awake, balanced and responsive. Song is not about becoming passive or switching off from the world. Rather, it reflects a nervous system that no longer needs to hold itself in constant readiness for threat.

Perhaps this invites a deeper question. What do we really need? Is it simply more safety through greater control and certainty, or do we also need more experiences of safeness that allow us to relax, connect, heal, grow and flourish?

Safety helps us survive.

Safeness helps us flourish.

"So... what does biopsychosocial-relational actually mean?"

It is a rather intimidating word, isn't it?

From time to time, people notice it on my website and ask what it means. My answer is usually, "It simply means I try to understand the whole person."

For many years mental health and psychology were often approached as though our difficulties came from one place. Some people looked almost entirely at the brain. Others focused on thoughts. Others looked at childhood. Others emphasised behaviour. Each perspective tells us something important. But none tells us everything.

The biopsychosocial-relational approach begins with a simple observation: human beings are complex.

Our biology matters. Sleep, pain, hormones, medications, exercise, illness and the way our nervous system functions all influence how we think and feel. Our psychology matters. Our thoughts, emotions, beliefs, habits, coping strategies and personality all shape how we experience the world. Our social world matters. Relationships, family, work, finances, community, loneliness and culture all leave their mark on us.

And then there is the fourth dimension that I think deserves equal attention—our relational lives.

We often think of ourselves as individuals who have relationships. I think it is the other way around. We are born into relationships. We learn language in relationships. Our brains develop in relationships. Our sense of safety and belonging develops in relationships. Even our understanding of who we are emerges through our relationships with others. Throughout life, relationships remain one of the greatest sources of both suffering and healing.

When someone walks into my consulting room, I am not asking, "What diagnosis fits this person?"

I am asking different questions. What has shaped this person's life? What is keeping these difficulties going? What function did this pattern once serve, and why has it become a problem now?

The answers can be very varied.

Sometimes the answer lies mainly in the body.
Sometimes it lies in unhelpful patterns of thinking.
Sometimes it lies in chronic stress, grief or trauma.
Sometimes it lies in a relationship that has become painful or disconnected.
More often than not, it is a combination of several things.

That is why I rarely believe there is a single answer for complex human problems. Understanding the whole person usually leads to more thoughtful, more individualised and, I hope, more compassionate care.

Perhaps a diagnosis is only the beginning of understanding a person, not the end of it.

— John Julian

"All that compassion stuff isn't really me."

Every now and then someone says something like this to me.

"I'm not really into all that compassion stuff. It sounds a bit soft."

I understand what they mean. In some parts of the world, the word compassion has come to mean a feeling of sympathy or tenderness towards another person. If that is what compassion means, then I can understand why some people are sceptical.

However, there is another way of understanding compassion, and I think it is far more helpful.

Compassion is not primarily a feeling. Compassion is a motivation. It is the motivation to notice suffering—our own or someone else's—and then to ask, "What would actually help?"

Think about a firefighter who runs into a burning house because there are still people inside. Nobody would describe that as sentimental or soft. The firefighter is motivated by compassion. That compassion may require courage, determination, skill, clear thinking and decisive action.

The same is true in everyday life:

Sometimes compassion is expressed through kindness.
Sometimes it takes courage.
Sometimes it means setting firm boundaries.
Sometimes it means having a difficult conversation.

Compassion is not about being nice all the time. It is about responding wisely to suffering.

Most people already practise compassion every day without ever using the word. The neighbour who quietly helps after a storm. The volunteer firefighter who heads out in the middle of the night. The parent who sits beside a frightened child. The friend who calls when life has fallen apart. None of these people are being sentimental. They are responding to suffering with wisdom and action.

The harder part, for many of us, is directing that same compassion towards ourselves.

One of the fascinating things about compassion is that it has three directions, sometimes called the three flows of compassion. We can offer compassion to others. We can learn to receive compassion from others when we need help or are simply having a difficult time. And we can develop compassion towards ourselves—often called self-compassion or inner compassion.

Many people discover that the first comes quite naturally. The other two can be surprisingly difficult.

When we make a mistake, we often become our own harshest critic. Yet if a close friend had done exactly the same thing, we would probably respond with understanding, encouragement and practical advice.

In my experience, compassion is not about feeling sorry for ourselves. It is about creating the conditions in which people can recover, grow and flourish. Far from making us weaker, it often gives us the courage to face the difficult parts of life with greater honesty and resilience.

Perhaps compassion isn't as "soft" as it first appears.

Perhaps it is one of the strongest motivations we can develop.

— John Julian

The Three Emotional Systems

Have you ever wondered why, on some days, you feel anxious and on edge, while on other days you feel motivated and energetic, and at other times calm and content?

One helpful way of understanding this comes from Compassion Focused Therapy, which suggests that our emotions are influenced by three interacting systems. All three are important. Problems usually arise when one becomes overactive or underused.

The Threat System

The threat system is designed to protect us.

It helps us notice danger and respond quickly. It is associated with emotions such as anxiety, anger and disgust, and prepares the body to fight, flee or freeze.

This system is essential for survival. However, in modern life it can also be activated by deadlines, conflict, criticism, uncertainty, financial pressures or worrying about the future. Even when there is no immediate danger, our body may respond as though there is.

The Drive System

The drive system motivates us to pursue goals and achieve things that are important.

It helps us work, learn, create, solve problems and experience satisfaction. It is the system that encourages us to keep moving forward.

The drive system contributes greatly to a meaningful life. However, if it is constantly switched on without enough rest, we may become exhausted, stressed or feel that we are never doing enough.

The Safeness System

The third system is often the most neglected.

The safeness system becomes active when we feel accepted, connected and at ease. It allows the body and mind to settle, helping us experience calm, warmth and contentment.

This system grows through supportive relationships, self-compassion, mindfulness, time in nature and activities that help the nervous system relax. In qigong, the quality of song—relaxed, alert ease—is one way of cultivating this state.

Finding Balance

Good mental health is not about eliminating the threat system or constantly chasing the drive system.

It is about helping these three systems work together in balance.

When the threat system dominates, life can feel overwhelming.

When the drive system dominates, we may become busy but never truly rested.

When we regularly cultivate experiences of safeness, we often become more resilient, think more clearly and respond to life's challenges with greater flexibility.

One simple question to ask yourself is:

Which of these three systems has been most active in my life this week?

The answer is often the first step towards understanding yourself with greater clarity and compassion.

Simply "Think Positively"

One of the most common pieces of advice people receive when they are struggling is, "Just think positively."

While well intentioned, it is often unhelpful.

If changing our thoughts were simply a matter of deciding to be more positive, most of us would do it. Yet anxiety, worry and self-criticism often continue despite our best efforts.

There is a good reason for this.

Our brains did not evolve primarily to make us happy. They evolved to help us survive.

For hundreds of thousands of years, the people who noticed danger quickly were more likely to stay alive. As a result, our brains became remarkably good at spotting problems, remembering painful experiences and imagining what might go wrong.

Psychologists sometimes call this the negativity bias. It means that our minds naturally pay more attention to criticism than compliments, problems than successes, and possible threats than opportunities.

This is normal.

It is not a personal weakness or a character flaw. It is part of being human.

That does not mean we are destined to live with anxiety or pessimism. Rather than trying to force positive thoughts, it is often more helpful to help the nervous system settle. As the body becomes calmer, the mind usually becomes more balanced as well.

Here are a few simple practices that many people find helpful.

1. Notice without arguing

Instead of trying to replace a negative thought with a positive one, simply notice it.

"I notice that my mind is predicting the worst."

Creating a little distance from the thought often reduces its power.

2. Ask, "Is this a fact or a prediction?"

An anxious mind often treats imagined futures as though they are happening now.

Gently ask yourself whether you are dealing with something that is actually happening, or something your mind is imagining.

3. Slow your breathing

When we are anxious, our breathing often becomes fast and shallow.

Taking a few slow, gentle breaths can help signal to the nervous system that there is no immediate danger.

4. Move your body

A short walk, some gentle stretching or a few minutes of qigong can help release physical tension and bring your attention back to the present moment.

Sometimes the body settles before the mind does.

5. Look for what is also true

This is different from pretending everything is wonderful.

If your mind says, "Everything is going wrong," ask yourself, "What is one thing that is also going well today?"

The goal is not blind optimism. It is a more balanced view of reality.

6. Spend time with people who help you feel safe

Supportive relationships help calm the nervous system.

Feeling listened to, accepted and understood often changes us far more deeply than trying to argue with our own thoughts.

A different way of thinking

Perhaps we have been asking the wrong question.

Instead of asking, "How can I think more positively?", it may be more helpful to ask:

"What would help my mind and body feel safe enough to see the world more clearly?"

As our nervous system experiences greater safeness, positive thoughts often emerge naturally. We do not force them. We simply create the conditions in which they can grow.

Positive thinking is not the goal.

A calmer, wiser and more compassionate relationship with ourselves is.

Why Do We Worry?

Almost everyone worries.

We worry about our health, our children, our relationships, money, work and the future. Sometimes worry is helpful. It encourages us to prepare, solve problems and make sensible decisions.

But worry can also become exhausting. Many people tell me, "I know I'm worrying too much, but I can't seem to stop."

The good news is that this doesn't mean there is something wrong with you. It means your brain is doing what it evolved to do. For most of human history, our ancestors survived because they noticed potential dangers before they became real dangers. Those who asked, "What if something goes wrong?" were often better prepared.

The human brain therefore became remarkably good at imagining future problems.

This ability has helped us build homes, create communities, invent technology and plan for the future.

But it also has a downside.

Our brains often struggle to distinguish between a real danger that exists now and a possible problem that might happen tomorrow, next week or next year.

As a result, our bodies may react to imagined events as though they are already happening:

Our heart beats faster,

Our muscles tighten, and

Sleep becomes difficult.

We keep thinking about the same problem over and over, hoping that if we think about it for long enough, we will eventually feel certain.

Unfortunately, life rarely offers complete certainty. Many worries cannot be solved simply by thinking harder. Instead, it can help to ask a different question:

"Is this something I can do something about today?"

If the answer is yes, take one small practical step.

If the answer is no, it may be kinder to acknowledge the worry, let it be there for the moment and gently return your attention to what is happening right now.

Mindfulness helps us notice when our mind has wandered into the future without criticising ourselves for doing so. Self-compassion reminds us that worrying is part of being human, especially when we care deeply about the people and things that matter to us.

You don't have to stop worrying completely. The goal is not to eliminate worry.

It is to recognise when worry is helping and when it is simply keeping your mind and body trapped in a state of constant alert.

Over time, many people discover that as they experience greater emotional safeness, their need to worry gradually begins to soften.

Worry may always be part of life.

It doesn't have to run your life.

What Happens in Counselling?

Many people feel nervous before their first counselling appointment.

You may wonder whether you will know what to say, whether you will be judged, or whether counselling will really help.

These concerns are completely understandable.

The first thing to know is that counselling is simply a conversation. It is a conversation with someone whose role is to listen carefully, ask thoughtful questions and help you make sense of your experiences.

There is no expectation that you will have everything worked out before you arrive.

Many people begin by saying, "I'm not really sure why I'm here," or "I don't know where to start."

That is perfectly okay.

Together, we gradually build a picture of what is happening in your life.

We might explore your current difficulties, your relationships, your work, your physical health, your emotions, your thinking patterns, your life experiences and the strengths that have helped you cope until now.

Rather than looking only at symptoms, we try to understand the whole person.

Often, difficulties such as anxiety, depression, stress or relationship problems do not arise from a single cause. They usually develop through a combination of our biology, our thoughts and emotions, our relationships and the wider world in which we live. Understanding these different influences often opens up new possibilities for change.

Counselling is not about being told what to do.

Instead, it is a collaborative process. Together we explore what is happening, what has contributed to it and what small, practical steps may help you move towards the life you want to live.

Sometimes this involves learning new skills, such as mindfulness, managing stress, improving communication or responding differently to difficult thoughts and emotions. At other times, simply feeling deeply heard and understood can itself become an important part of healing.

Progress is rarely about making one dramatic breakthrough.

More often, it comes through many small changes that gradually build over time. As people develop greater understanding, self-compassion and confidence, they often discover that situations which once felt overwhelming become easier to manage.

There is no "perfect" client. You do not need to be articulate, brave or certain. You only need to come as you are. Counselling is not about becoming someone different.

It is about understanding yourself more deeply, discovering your own strengths and developing new ways of responding to life's challenges.

For many people, that journey begins with a single conversation.

Understanding ourselves, our relationships and the world we live in

Over many years I have written these essays to help people better understand themselves, their relationships and the challenges of living well in a rapidly changing world.

Some have been written in response to questions raised in counselling, others have grown from my work in mindfulness, relationship therapy and mental health, while others simply explore ideas that I have found helpful in both my professional practice and personal life.

Although they draw on contemporary research in psychology, neuroscience and mindfulness, they have been written for a general audience. My hope is that they are practical, thoughtful and accessible, offering ideas that support reflection, resilience and wellbeing in everyday life.

You are welcome to read, download and share these resources for your own learning.

Themes

The essays cover a range of topics, including:

anxiety, stress and emotional wellbeing
relationships and communication
mindfulness and compassion
attachment and trauma
emotional regulation
interpersonal neurobiology
personal growth and resilience
living well in a changing world

A Personal Invitation

Not every essay will speak to every reader.

My suggestion is simply to browse the titles and begin with whatever captures your interest or reflects where you are in life at the moment. Sometimes a single idea or a different way of looking at a situation can open the door to meaningful change.

If, after reading an essay, you feel you would benefit from talking further, I would be pleased to discuss how counselling may be able to help.

Current Essays

"May you never lose sight of the shelter that is within you."

— John O'Donohue

A lot of people become quite anxious about money and their superannuation or savings. A recent article on SBS reported that the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) now estimates that a single homeowner retiring at age 67 would need approximately $630,000 in superannuation to achieve what ASFA describes as a "comfortable" retirement. For couples, the figure has risen to around $730,000. For many Australians, the immediate reaction is understandable. They open their superannuation statement, compare their balance with these figures, and conclude that they are financially unprepared for retirement. Some may even wonder whether they have failed.

Yet this is not necessarily what the ASFA data is actually saying.

The first thing to understand is that these figures are benchmarks rather than prescriptions. They describe the amount of superannuation ASFA estimates is needed to support a particular lifestyle in retirement. They are not a declaration that anyone with less money will be poor, miserable, or unable to retire. The figures are intended as planning guides rather than judgments.

This distinction is important because the ASFA "comfortable retirement" standard reflects a particular vision of later life. It assumes access to private health insurance, regular leisure activities, domestic travel, occasional restaurant meals, replacement of household goods when needed, a reliable vehicle, and the ability to maintain a home without significant financial stress. In other words, the figures are not measuring survival. They are estimating the resources required to support a relatively comfortable and secure lifestyle.

There is, however, a deeper assumption embedded within this model. It largely assumes that the patterns of consumption that characterised our middle years should continue into retirement. It reflects a cultural belief that comfort, success, and even personal worth are closely linked to our ability to consume goods, services, experiences, and technologies. In this sense, the model is not simply an economic description. It is also a cultural one.

For much of the last century, Western societies have increasingly measured progress and wellbeing through economic growth and consumption. The good life came to be associated with having more, upgrading more, travelling more, and purchasing more. Retirement planning naturally inherited many of these assumptions. A comfortable retirement, therefore, became defined not merely by security and freedom from hardship, but by the capacity to continue consuming at levels similar to those enjoyed during one's working years.

Yet this raises an important question. Is the purpose of retirement to continue consuming, or is it to create the conditions for a good life?

Many people discover as they age that their sources of satisfaction begin to change. Time becomes more valuable than possessions. Relationships become more important than status. Meaningful activity becomes more important than accumulation. The question gradually shifts from "What else can I acquire?" to "What is enough?" For some people, a comfortable retirement may indeed involve ongoing travel, regular dining out, and frequent purchases. For others, comfort may arise from a productive garden, involvement in community life, time with family and friends, creative pursuits, spiritual practice, learning, volunteering, or simply the freedom to live at a slower and more deliberate pace.

This does not make the ASFA benchmark wrong. It simply means that it reflects one particular vision of a good retirement rather than the only possible vision. The challenge for each of us is to decide what kind of life we actually wish to sustain and then determine the resources required to support it.

The other assumption hidden within the headline figure is that the retiree owns their home outright. This single factor changes the equation dramatically. Housing is typically the largest expense faced by Australian households. A person who enters retirement while still renting faces a very different financial reality from someone who owns their home free of debt. ASFA itself acknowledges this distinction, with substantially higher savings requirements applying to renters. Consequently, two retirees with identical superannuation balances may experience very different levels of financial security depending on their housing circumstances.

Many people also overlook the role of the Age Pension. Australia's retirement income system was never designed on the assumption that everyone would fund their retirement entirely through superannuation. Rather, it combines superannuation, the Age Pension, and personal savings or assets. For retirees with modest super balances, the Age Pension often provides a substantial proportion of their income. Unlike superannuation investments, it is indexed, government-backed, and paid for life. In effect, it functions as a guaranteed income stream, yet its contribution is often underestimated when people assess their financial position.

The real question, therefore, is not simply, "How much super do I have?" The more useful question may be, "What does my life actually cost?" Retirement is not a competition to accumulate the largest possible balance. Rather, it is a process of matching resources to needs. Two people can retire with exactly the same financial assets and experience very different levels of wellbeing because their expectations, living costs, health, relationships, and sources of meaning differ substantially.

Many Australians approach retirement carrying assumptions formed during their working years. They imagine that retirement spending will closely resemble the expenditure patterns of full-time employment. Yet retirement often removes a range of expenses. Commuting costs disappear. Work clothing becomes less important. Mortgage repayments may cease. Tax obligations frequently decline. At the same time, many people discover they have more time for lower-cost activities such as gardening, walking, reading, volunteering, community participation, and spending time with family and friends.

This does not mean financial concerns should be dismissed. Rising costs remain a genuine challenge. Electricity, fuel, food, insurance, council rates, and healthcare have all increased significantly in recent years. Inflation has eroded purchasing power and created understandable uncertainty among retirees and those approaching retirement. However, broad population statistics can create unnecessary anxiety when they are interpreted as personal judgments rather than general planning guides.

A figure such as $630,000 is useful as a benchmark. It is not a verdict on whether an individual has enough. What matters is the interaction between housing, spending habits, pension eligibility, health, social supports, and personal expectations. Retirement is therefore not simply a financial calculation. It is also a lifestyle question.

Indeed, some of the strongest predictors of wellbeing in later life have little to do with the size of a person's superannuation balance. Research consistently points towards the importance of purpose, relationships, community participation, physical activity, meaningful contribution, and a sense of belonging. These are assets that never appear on a superannuation statement, yet they often contribute more to life satisfaction than an additional hundred thousand dollars in savings.

Beyond Superannuation: The Question We Rarely Ask

Yet there is another question largely absent from most discussions of retirement.

How do we gain happiness?

Or perhaps more accurately, what actually contributes to a good life?

Many people spend decades assuming that happiness lies just beyond the next financial milestone. First, it is paying off the mortgage. Then it is reaching a particular income. Then it is accumulating a certain amount in superannuation. The number changes, but the underlying assumption remains the same: once I reach that point, I will finally feel secure, relaxed, and content. Yet the goalposts often continue to move. What once seemed sufficient no longer feels sufficient, and the promise of contentment recedes further into the distance.

Research on wellbeing repeatedly suggests that once our basic needs are met, additional wealth has a diminishing impact on life satisfaction. This does not mean money is unimportant. Financial insecurity can be profoundly stressful, and poverty is associated with poorer health and fewer opportunities. Adequate financial resources matter greatly. However, beyond a certain point, the question begins to shift. We move from asking, "How much more do I need?" to asking, "How do I wish to live?"

The challenge is that modern consumer culture continually encourages us to focus on accumulation. It tells us that satisfaction lies in acquiring more: more money, more possessions, more experiences, more status. Yet many older people discover that what they value most is not another purchase but another conversation, another walk, another day in the garden, another shared meal, another opportunity to contribute, and another chance to be present to life. A retirement filled with anxiety about whether one's super balance is large enough may be far less satisfying than a retirement built around friendship, learning, service, creativity, spiritual practice, gardening, walking, volunteering, grandchildren, community, and simple appreciation of ordinary moments.

Indeed, some of the greatest sources of happiness are remarkably inexpensive. Watching a sunrise, sharing a cup of tea with a friend, reading a good book, tending vegetables, listening to birdsong, being useful to another person, or feeling part of a community require little financial outlay, yet all are repeatedly associated with human wellbeing. This suggests that the deeper purpose of retirement planning may not be to maximise wealth but to create the conditions that allow us to flourish.

The question, therefore, is not simply whether we have accumulated enough money. It is whether we have also cultivated the relationships, interests, skills, values, and communities that enable a meaningful life. While money can buy comfort, security, and opportunity, it cannot by itself provide happiness. That arises from how we live, who we live with, what we care about, and the extent to which we feel connected to the world around us.

The SBS article raises an important conversation. Rising living costs and housing insecurity are real issues, particularly for younger Australians who may not enter retirement as homeowners. These challenges deserve serious attention. At the same time, many current retirees and those approaching retirement may unnecessarily alarm themselves when they see large superannuation targets reported in the media.

Rather than asking whether we have reached a particular number, perhaps the better question is this:

What is enough for the life we actually wish to live?

For some people, that answer may indeed require $630,000 or more. For others, especially homeowners with access to the Age Pension and relatively modest needs, enough may be considerably less. The challenge is not simply to accumulate wealth. The challenge is to understand what constitutes a good life and to ensure our resources align with that vision.

In the end, the most important retirement question may not be, "How much money do I need?"

It may be, "What is enough for the life I actually wish to live?"

Sunrise through gum leaves

Nothing more is needed now

The day is enough

When Not Knowing Feels Unsafe: Anxiety, Uncertainty, and the Words We Use to Cope

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY

Anxiety often grows when we do not know what is going to happen. The mind tries to protect us by searching for answers, predicting danger, asking for reassurance, or trying to control the situation. Sometimes this helps, but often it makes us more tense, reactive, or self-critical.

When uncertainty feels unsafe, our words can become sharper. We may accuse others, catastrophise, demand certainty, or speak harshly to ourselves. A more helpful path is to notice: “I am anxious, not certain.” This gives us space to slow down, breathe, ask more kindly, and respond with more steadiness.

The aim is not to remove all uncertainty from life. That is impossible. The aim is to build enough inner calm, compassion, and support so that uncertainty can be held without panic, hostility, or self-attack.

Three Things You Can Try

First, pause and name what is happening: “This is uncertainty, and my threat system is active.” Naming it can reduce the sense that the anxious story is the whole truth.

Second, replace certainty-language with kinder language. Instead of “This will go badly,” try “I do not know yet.” Instead of “They do not care,” try “I am feeling unsure and would like reassurance.”

Third, consider getting support from face to face, or both John and Joanna with online appointment. If anxiety, worry, relationship stress, or harsh self-talk are becoming difficult to manage, you are welcome to book an appointment with me for counselling, stress reduction, or relationship support through Thinking Healthy.

Introduction

Human beings are meaning-making creatures. We do not simply experience events; we interpret them, predict them, rehearse them, and speak them into stories. When life feels steady, this capacity helps us plan, connect, and respond wisely. But when uncertainty rises, the same capacity can become a source of suffering. The mind begins to scan for danger, the body prepares for threat, and language often becomes sharper, more absolute, more suspicious, or more self-attacking.

Anxiety is not only fear of what is happening now. Very often, it is fear of what might happen next. The anxious mind is drawn toward unfinished stories: What if something goes wrong? What if I am rejected? What if they leave? What if I cannot cope? What if I never know the truth? In these moments, uncertainty itself can begin to feel unsafe. Contemporary research describes this pattern as intolerance of uncertainty: the tendency to experience ambiguity, unpredictability, or lack of clarity as threatening, distressing, or unacceptable (Carleton, 2012, 2016; Dugas et al., 1998).

This article explores how anxiety changes the way we think, speak, and listen. It argues that many harsh words, accusations, demands, and self-critical thoughts are not simply failures of character. They are often attempts by a threatened nervous system to regain control. When not knowing feels dangerous, the mind may try to reduce uncertainty by creating premature certainty. It may blame, predict, interrogate, catastrophise, or turn against itself. Yet these strategies often deepen the very threat they are trying to resolve.

The central claim is simple: anxiety often demands certainty, but healing often requires the capacity to remain kind while certainty is not yet available.

Uncertainty and the Threat System

Uncertainty is not a minor inconvenience for the human brain. From an evolutionary perspective, uncertainty about possible threat carries survival significance. If we do not know whether a sound in the dark is wind, animal, stranger, or danger, the body prepares before the mind has fully understood. This anticipatory response is adaptive when danger is real. However, in anxiety, the system can become overactive, treating ambiguous social, emotional, or bodily cues as if they were urgent threats.

Anxiety is strongly linked to uncertainty about future threat. When people cannot predict whether something bad will happen, or cannot determine how to prevent it, the brain’s anticipatory systems become more active. These systems involve threat estimation, attention, action preparation, and emotion regulation. In anxiety, they can become biased toward danger, making uncertainty feel not merely uncomfortable but biologically unsafe (Grupe & Nitschke, 2013).

This helps explain why anxious people often seek reassurance, clarity, explanation, or control. They are not necessarily being difficult. Their nervous system may be trying to reduce threat by reducing ambiguity. Yet the relief gained through reassurance is often temporary. The mind soon generates another “what if?” question. The body tightens again. The search for certainty resumes.

The stress system is central to this process. When uncertainty is interpreted as threat, the body mobilises. Stress hormones such as cortisol help prepare the body for action. In short bursts, this response can be useful. But when uncertainty becomes chronic — through relational instability, financial stress, health anxiety, trauma, social conflict, or persistent self-doubt — the stress response can become prolonged. Chronic activation of stress pathways is associated with inflammation, mood disturbance, impaired cognition, and increased vulnerability to depression and anxiety-related conditions (McEwen, 1998, 2007; Slavich & Irwin, 2014).

In this sense, uncertainty is not only a cognitive problem. It is an embodied state. It lives in the breath, muscles, gut, heart rate, sleep, immune system, and language.

Intolerance of Uncertainty

Intolerance of uncertainty refers to the tendency to respond negatively to uncertain situations and events, regardless of the actual probability of harm. It is not simply “not liking uncertainty.” Most people prefer clarity. Intolerance of uncertainty is more specific: it is the experience of uncertainty as unacceptable, threatening, or impossible to tolerate.

Dugas and colleagues placed intolerance of uncertainty at the centre of their cognitive-behavioural model of generalised anxiety disorder. Their model proposed that excessive worry is maintained by several interacting processes: intolerance of uncertainty, positive beliefs about worry, poor problem orientation, and cognitive avoidance (Dugas et al., 1998). In simple terms, the anxious person may believe that worrying helps them prepare, prevents disappointment, or keeps them safe. But worry also keeps the threat system active.

Carleton later argued that intolerance of uncertainty may be a transdiagnostic process across anxiety disorders and related conditions. It is not limited to generalised anxiety disorder. It can appear in health anxiety, obsessive-compulsive patterns, social anxiety, panic, trauma-related anxiety, depression, and everyday relational distress. The core fear is not always a specific object or event. Sometimes the deeper fear is simply the unknown (Carleton, 2012, 2016; Carleton et al., 2012).

This matters clinically because people often present with the content of worry: health, money, relationships, children, ageing, reputation, climate, politics, work, or bodily symptoms. But beneath the content there may be a process: the mind cannot rest until it knows. It wants a guarantee. It wants closure. It wants the future to become emotionally settled before the future has arrived.

The problem is that life does not provide this level of certainty. Relationships remain partly unknowable. Bodies change. Other people have inner lives we cannot fully access. The future remains open. Therefore, the task is not to eliminate uncertainty. The task is to build enough inner and relational safeness to live with uncertainty without turning it into hostility, panic, withdrawal, or self-attack.

The Language of Anxious Certainty

When uncertainty feels unsafe, language often becomes more absolute. The anxious mind may say:

“You always do this.”

“You never listen.”

“I know what this means.”

“This will end badly.”

“I cannot cope.”

“They are going to reject me.”

“Something is wrong.”

“I have ruined everything.”

These statements may feel like truth in the moment, but they are often threat-language. They reduce ambiguity by turning possibility into certainty. The mind would rather hold a painful story than remain open in the discomfort of not knowing.

This is one of the hidden pathways by which anxiety becomes hostility. If I feel uncertain about your care for me, I may accuse you of not caring. If I feel uncertain about the future of a relationship, I may demand reassurance in a way that feels controlling. If I feel uncertain about my own worth, I may attack myself before anyone else can. If I feel uncertain about another person’s intentions, I may interpret ambiguity as betrayal.

Worry is not simply chosen. It emerges from habitual patterns of attention, interpretation, imagery, and attempted control. The anxious mind is pulled toward threat and then tries to manage that threat through more thinking (Hirsch & Mathews, 2012).

Language is central to this process. Worry is often verbal. It runs as inner speech. It rehearses scenarios, arguments, explanations, defences, accusations, and possible disasters. In this way, language becomes both a symptom of anxiety and a mechanism that maintains it.

Worry as an Attempted Solution

Worry is often misunderstood. From the outside, it can look irrational or repetitive. From the inside, it often feels responsible. The worried person may believe that if they think hard enough, anticipate enough, prepare enough, or suffer enough in advance, they may prevent harm.

This is why worry can become addictive. It gives the illusion of control. It feels like action, even when no useful action is occurring. It can also function as emotional avoidance. Rather than feeling grief, vulnerability, loneliness, shame, or longing directly, the mind moves into analysis. It thinks and thinks, hoping that cognition will protect the heart.

Dugas and colleagues identified positive beliefs about worry as one of the maintaining factors in generalised anxiety disorder. People may believe that worry helps them solve problems, prevents bad outcomes, shows care, or prepares them emotionally. However, when worry becomes chronic, it narrows attention, increases physiological arousal, and reduces flexible problem-solving (Dugas et al., 1998).

This distinction is important. Planning is useful. Problem-solving is useful. Clarifying a request is useful. But worry often masquerades as these things while remaining circular. It does not move toward wise action. It loops.

A simple clinical distinction may help:

Problem-solving asks: “What can I do next?”

Worry asks: “What if this never becomes safe?”

Problem-solving has an endpoint. Worry keeps reopening the wound. Problem-solving engages reality. Worry often rehearses imagined threat. Problem-solving can occur with kindness. Worry often occurs with inner pressure, fear, or self-attack.

The goal is not to shame worry. Worry is an understandable attempt to cope. But it is an exhausting and incomplete strategy. It needs to be met with compassion, grounded attention, and a gradual strengthening of the capacity to remain present when certainty is unavailable.

Relationships Under Uncertainty

Relationships are among the most powerful sources of uncertainty. We can love another person deeply and still not fully know what they are thinking, feeling, intending, or becoming. We can ask for honesty, but we cannot possess another person’s inner life. We can build trust, but we cannot remove vulnerability. This is why attachment, anxiety, and uncertainty are so closely linked.

When uncertainty enters a relationship, the threat system may interpret delay, ambiguity, distraction, tiredness, silence, or difference as danger. A delayed reply may become “They do not care.” A change in tone may become “They are leaving.” A boundary may become “I am being rejected.” A disagreement may become “This relationship is unsafe.”

The anxious person may then seek certainty through interrogation, repeated reassurance-seeking, accusation, emotional protest, withdrawal, sarcasm, or contempt-adjacent speech. These strategies are understandable attempts to restore safety, but they often produce the opposite effect. The other person may feel pressured, mistrusted, criticised, or trapped. They may withdraw or defend themselves. Their withdrawal then confirms the anxious person’s fear. A loop begins.

This is where the language of uncertainty becomes crucial. Compare these two statements:

“You clearly do not care about me.”

“I am feeling uncertain and my threat system is turning that into a fear that I do not matter.”

The first statement accuses. The second discloses.

The first statement creates defence. The second invites contact.

The first statement claims certainty. The second names uncertainty.

The first statement escalates threat. The second makes repair possible.

This is not merely a matter of politeness. It is neurobiological. When language shifts from accusation to vulnerable disclosure, it gives the prefrontal cortex more room to participate. It reduces the immediate interpersonal threat. It makes co-regulation more possible. It also protects dignity, because the speaker is no longer required to pretend certainty where there is actually fear.

Self-Talk and the Fear of Not Coping

Intolerance of uncertainty does not only affect relationships with others. It also affects the relationship with oneself. Anxious self-talk often takes the form of catastrophic prediction:

“I cannot cope.”

“I will fall apart.”

“I will never get through this.”

“I should know what to do.”

“I am weak.”

“I am too much.”

“I have failed.”

These statements are not neutral. They are inner verbal events that activate threat. They shape posture, breath, attention, memory, and physiology. They also narrow identity. The person becomes not someone experiencing uncertainty, but someone who believes they are incapable of surviving it.

A more compassionate formulation would be:

“This is uncertain, and my body is reacting as if uncertainty is danger.”

“I do not yet know what will happen, but I can take the next wise step.”

“I am anxious, not necessarily unsafe.”

“My mind is predicting catastrophe; that does not mean catastrophe is certain.”

“I can ask for support without attacking myself.”

Self-compassion research is relevant here. Neff conceptualised self-compassion as involving self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness rather than self-judgement, isolation, and over-identification (Neff, 2003). Compassion-focused approaches similarly emphasise the development of a soothing and safeness system that can help regulate threat-based emotions (Gilbert, 2009, 2014). Compassion is not indulgence. It is the courage to turn toward suffering with wisdom, strength, and care.

This is particularly important in anxiety. If a person responds to anxiety with self-attack, the threat system receives a second blow. First there is uncertainty. Then there is shame about being uncertain. The person is no longer only afraid of the situation; they are afraid of themselves in the situation.

Compassionate self-talk interrupts this doubling of threat. It does not remove all uncertainty. It changes the internal climate in which uncertainty is held.

The Body in Uncertainty

Although intolerance of uncertainty is often described cognitively, it is deeply bodily. The person may feel tightness in the chest, constriction in the throat, agitation in the limbs, nausea in the gut, heat in the face, or a restless need to act. These sensations can then become further evidence that something is wrong.

This is how anxiety becomes self-amplifying. The mind detects uncertainty. The body mobilises. The person notices bodily arousal. The mind interprets the arousal as danger. More stress hormones are released. Attention narrows. Language becomes more urgent. The person seeks certainty even more intensely.

The stress system helps explain why this loop is so powerful. Stress responses are designed to mobilise energy, sharpen attention, and prepare action. But when the threat is ambiguous, relational, imagined, or unresolved, the mobilisation may have nowhere to go. The body is prepared for danger, but the danger is partly constructed through interpretation and anticipation. Over time, chronic stress activation can affect immune function, inflammation, cardiovascular risk, sleep, memory, and mood (McEwen, 1998, 2007; Slavich & Irwin, 2014).

Therefore, working with uncertainty requires more than cognitive reframing. It also requires bodily settling. Slow breathing, walking, qigong, grounding through the senses, warm voice tone, compassionate imagery, mindful movement, and contact with nature can all help create the physiological conditions in which uncertainty becomes more tolerable.

The phrase is important: more tolerable, not necessarily comfortable.

Healing does not mean uncertainty disappears. It means the body learns that uncertainty can be survived without panic, attack, collapse, or compulsive control.

From Control to Contact

When uncertainty feels unsafe, the anxious mind often moves toward control. It wants the answer now. It wants the other person to reassure perfectly. It wants the future to be guaranteed. It wants the body to stop feeling anxious. It wants the mind to stop asking questions.

But control is not the same as safety. In relationships, control often reduces trust. In the body, control often increases tension. In the mind, control often strengthens the very thoughts one is trying to suppress.

A more helpful movement is from control to contact.

Contact with the body: “What am I feeling?”

Contact with the breath: “Can I soften the next exhale?”

Contact with the present moment: “What is actually happening now?”

Contact with the other person: “Can I ask without accusing?”

Contact with values: “Who do I want to be while I do not yet know?”

Contact with compassion: “Can I meet this fear without making it worse?”

This is not passivity. It is disciplined non-reactivity. It allows action to arise from steadiness rather than panic. Sometimes the wise action is to ask a clear question. Sometimes it is to set a boundary. Sometimes it is to wait. Sometimes it is to gather information. Sometimes it is to stop rehearsing a conversation that is not yet happening.

The key is that the action comes after regulation, not as a substitute for it.

A Kinder Vocabulary for Uncertainty

Because language shapes the nervous system, we need a vocabulary that helps us remain human when we do not know. This is especially important for people who tend to move quickly from uncertainty into accusation, self-attack, or catastrophic prediction.

Instead of saying, “This is going to be terrible,” we might say, “My mind is predicting danger.”

Instead of saying, “You do not care,” we might say, “I am feeling insecure and would like reassurance.”

Instead of saying, “I cannot cope,” we might say, “This feels hard, and I need to take one step at a time.”

Instead of saying, “I know what this means,” we might say, “I am forming a story, but I may not yet have all the information.”

Instead of saying, “I need certainty now,” we might say, “I am finding the uncertainty difficult, and I want to respond carefully.”

Instead of saying, “Something is wrong with me,” we might say, “My threat system is active.”

Instead of saying, “I should be over this,” we might say, “This is taking time, and I can meet it with patience.”

These phrases are not sentimental. They are regulatory tools. They keep the mind from collapsing possibility into threat. They protect relationships from unnecessary accusation. They help the body recognise that uncertainty is not the same as danger.

A particularly useful phrase is:

“This is uncertain, not necessarily unsafe.”

Another is:

“I am anxious, not certain.”

These statements create a small but vital gap between feeling and fact. In that gap, wisdom can begin.

Clinical and Everyday Practices

There are several practical ways to work with intolerance of uncertainty.

The first is to name the process. Rather than becoming lost in the content of worry, one can say, “This is intolerance of uncertainty.” Naming the process reduces fusion with the story. The issue is no longer only the feared event; it is also the mind’s difficulty remaining open.

The second is to distinguish solvable from unsolvable worry. If a problem can be acted upon, identify the next concrete step. If it cannot be solved now, practise returning to the body, the present moment, and compassionate self-talk.

The third is to delay reassurance-seeking. This does not mean refusing all support. It means noticing the urge to seek immediate certainty and gently extending the window of tolerance. Even a delay of ten minutes can begin to teach the nervous system that uncertainty can be survived.

The fourth is to practise behavioural experiments. If the mind says, “I cannot cope unless I know now,” the experiment is to wait, breathe, walk, write, or seek support without demanding immediate closure. Over time, the person learns through experience, not just thought, that uncertainty is uncomfortable but not always dangerous.

The fifth is to shift from accusation to disclosure. In relationships, this may be the most important practice. Instead of “You are making me anxious,” one might say, “I am feeling anxious and I am trying not to turn that into blame.” This protects both people.

The sixth is to develop compassionate imagery or an inner compassionate voice. This may involve imagining a wise, warm, steady figure, or cultivating one’s own compassionate self. The purpose is not to erase fear but to bring a different motivational system online: one organised around care, courage, and steadiness rather than threat and control.

The seventh is to use rhythm. Walking, qigong, breathing, chanting, gardening, cooking, and steady hand movements can all help regulate arousal. Rhythm gives the body a predictable pattern when the mind is facing unpredictability. This is one reason contemplative and embodied practices are so valuable in anxiety work.

Conclusion: The Courage to Not Know Kindly

Uncertainty is part of being alive. We cannot love without uncertainty. We cannot age without uncertainty. We cannot build trust without uncertainty. We cannot make meaningful choices without stepping into futures we do not fully control.

Anxiety tries to protect us from this vulnerability by demanding certainty. Sometimes it does so through worry. Sometimes through control. Sometimes through hostile words. Sometimes through self-attack. But these strategies often make the inner and relational world less safe.

The alternative is not indifference. It is compassionate steadiness. It is the capacity to say, “I do not yet know, and I can still remain kind.” It is the willingness to ask for clarity without accusation, to feel fear without obeying every fearful story, and to speak to oneself as one would speak to someone deeply loved.

When not knowing feels unsafe, the task is not to force certainty. The task is to create conditions of safeness in which uncertainty can be held. This is a biological, psychological, relational, and ethical practice.

The anxious mind wants closure.

The compassionate mind creates enough safety to wait.

References

Bomyea, J., Ramsawh, H., Ball, T. M., Taylor, C. T., Paulus, M. P., Lang, A. J., Simmons, A. N., & Stein, M. B. (2015). Intolerance of uncertainty as a mediator of reductions in worry in a cognitive behavioural treatment programme for generalised anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 33, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.05.004

Carleton, R. N. (2012). The intolerance of uncertainty construct in the context of anxiety disorders: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 12(8), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.12.82

Carleton, R. N. (2016). Into the unknown: A review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 39, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.02.007

Carleton, R. N., Mulvogue, M. K., Thibodeau, M. A., McCabe, R. E., Antony, M. M., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2012). Intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(3), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.01.011

Dugas, M. J., Gagnon, F., Ladouceur, R., & Freeston, M. H. (1998). Generalised anxiety disorder: A preliminary test of a conceptual model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00070-3

Gilbert, P. (2009). The compassionate mind: A new approach to life’s challenges. Constable.

Gilbert, P. (2014). The compassionate mind: A new approach to life’s challenges. New Harbinger.

Grupe, D. W., & Nitschke, J. B. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(7), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3524

Hirsch, C. R., & Mathews, A. (2012). A cognitive model of pathological worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(10), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.06.007

Ladouceur, R., Gosselin, P., & Dugas, M. J. (2000). Experimental manipulation of intolerance of uncertainty: A study of a theoretical model of worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(9), 933–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00133-3

McEwen, B. S. (1998). Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. The New England Journal of Medicine, 338(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199801153380307

McEwen, B. S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiological Reviews, 87(3), 873–904. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00041.2006

Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualisation of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032

Slavich, G. M., & Irwin, M. R. (2014). From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: A social signal transduction theory of depression. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 774–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035302

How Hostile Words Harm the Brain, Body, and Relationships

Introduction

Many people seem to believe that speaking words, whether internally or externally, does not really affect them. After all, they are only words. Do they affect us? What does science say?

Words are not merely vehicles of communication; they are catalysts that shape the human brain and body. Whether spoken aloud, whispered, or internally rehearsed, words have the power to ignite our stress systems, alter our immune responses, and reinforce neurological pathways that can either foster healing or deepen suffering. Hostile language, whether self-directed or projected onto others, has particularly potent effects. This paper synthesises evidence from neuroscience, psychoneuroimmunology, interpersonal neurobiology, and contemplative science to explain how language activates biological stress systems, reshapes brain structures, impacts relationships, and reinforces maladaptive emotional patterns.

Over time, repeated use of hostile or demeaning language creates a feedback loop of dysregulation. It activates threat responses, floods the body with stress hormones like cortisol, impairs immune and cardiovascular functioning, and narrows one's capacity for empathy, reasoning, and relational repair. Understanding the biological and psychological underpinnings of harmful language allows us to reframe our communication habits, not only for the sake of others, but for our own mental and physical health.

Why Language Matters: The Biology of Words

Every spoken word is also a neural event. Brain imaging studies have shown that language—especially emotionally charged or personally significant words—activates distributed networks involving the prefrontal cortex (PFC), limbic system, insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and subcortical structures like the amygdala (Buchanan, Lutz, Mirz, & Lund, 2000; Kross et al., 2009). Even inner speech, or “self-talk,” recruits these areas, creating tangible physiological effects (Morin, 2011).

Compassionate, affiliative language tends to activate the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and parasympathetic pathways associated with calmness, connection, and emotional repair. Conversely, aggressive or self-critical language engages threat systems, activating the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. This results in the release of cortisol, an increase in heart rate, vasoconstriction, and inflammation (Slavich & Irwin, 2014; McEwen, 1998).

Importantly, these biological responses occur whether the language is directed at others or turned inward. As Siegel (2012) summarises Donald Hebb's (1949) work, “neurons that fire together wire together” - repeated patterns of speech, especially when emotionally intense, create and strengthen neural pathways. Hence, hostile language becomes habitual not only in thought but also in our very biology.

Moreover, words influence posture, breath patterns, heart rate variability (HRV), immune cell function, and digestive health (Sapolsky, 2004; Miller & Chen, 2010). This phenomenon illustrates the concept of the body-mind: communication and embodiment are not separate. Every insult, whether silent or shouted, ripples through the soma.

The Brain on Words: Key Regions Affected

The Amygdala

The amygdala is the brain’s alarm centre. It detects threats and generates rapid fight, flight, or freeze responses. Hostile language, particularly when frequent or intense, causes chronic amygdala activation (LeDoux, 2000). Even perceived threats—like criticism or humiliation—can result in prolonged amygdala arousal. Over time, this state of hypervigilance can become the brain’s default mode, impairing social perception and deepening reactivity (Gilbert, 2009).

The Prefrontal Cortex (PFC)

The PFC governs executive functions—our capacity to pause, reflect, plan, and regulate emotions. When functioning well, the PFC helps us override impulsive speech and redirect aggression into constructive action. However, repeated activation of threat pathways weakens prefrontal control. Chronic hostility, whether expressed or internalised, has been linked to reduced gray matter in the medial PFC and weakened top-down regulation of limbic regions (Creswell et al., 2007). This leaves individuals more prone to rumination, reactive speech, and interpersonal conflict.

The Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC)

The ACC bridges emotion and cognition. It plays a key role in error detection, emotional conflict, and social pain. Verbal rejection or demeaning self-talk activates the ACC in ways similar to physical injury (Eisenberger & Lieberman, 2004). This supports the idea that “words can wound”—the brain processes social pain with the same circuitry as bodily harm.

The Insula

The insula is the hub of interoception—our felt sense of bodily states. It is especially active in moments of shame, disgust, or internalised rejection (Craig, 2009). Harsh words trigger the insula, creating gut-level sensations like nausea or tightness. In trauma-exposed individuals, repeated activation of the insula can contribute to alexithymia (difficulty identifying emotions) and disembodiment.

The HPA Axis (Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal System)

The HPA axis orchestrates our stress response. Aggressive or shaming language triggers a surge of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), followed by adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol. Repeated verbal hostility leads to prolonged HPA axis activation, immune suppression, increased inflammatory markers (e.g., IL-6, CRP), and impaired neurogenesis (Lupien et al., 2009). It accelerates biological aging and increases risks for depression, cardiovascular disease, and autoimmune disorders (Epel et al., 2004; McEwen, 2007).

Neuroplastic Effects

Verbal aggression literally rewires the brain. Neuroplasticity ensures that repeated patterns of thought and language strengthen specific neural circuits. If those circuits involve contempt, blame, or hostility, then threat becomes our default mode. This rewiring impairs empathy and reduces the brain’s capacity for affiliative emotion or conflict resolution (Kross et al., 2009).

Behavioural Consequences of Repeated Verbal Aggression

Repeated use of hostile language—especially within intimate relationships or caregiving contexts—can lead to entrenched behavioural patterns marked by blame, reactivity, and relational avoidance. For instance, a parent who regularly uses critical language with their child may unwittingly condition the child’s nervous system to associate communication with shame or fear, altering not only attachment patterns but also the child’s stress response over time (Siegel & Hartzell, 2004). Similarly, couples who habitually exchange barbed or contemptuous remarks may develop a co-escalation loop wherein both partners remain stuck in a state of defensive arousal, unable to access affiliative or repair-based communication (Gottman & Gottman, 2017). These behaviours are not simply habits—they reflect neurobiological circuits shaped and reinforced by emotionally charged language.

Telomere Shortening: A Cellular Marker of Verbal Hostility

Emerging research links psychological stress, especially chronic self-criticism or social conflict, to telomere shortening. Telomeres are protective caps at the ends of chromosomes that shorten with cellular division and stress. Shorter telomeres are associated with aging, inflammation, and disease risk (Epel et al., 2004).

Hostile language accelerates telomere shortening by increasing oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines, both of which damage DNA and cellular repair mechanisms. Studies show individuals with high levels of hostility, or who endure chronic verbal stress, have significantly shorter telomeres—even after adjusting for health behaviours and socioeconomic factors (O’Donovan et al., 2011).

In this light, chronic verbal hostility can be understood as a form of accelerated biological aging. Kindness and emotional regulation are not just social virtues—they are cellular protectants.

How Hostile Language Harms the Speaker

It is often assumed that verbal abuse mainly harms the recipient. But neuroscience shows the speaker is also deeply affected. Habitual use of demeaning language reinforces their own threat system, weakens emotional regulation, and damages physical health.

Emotional Brain Systems in the Speaker

Threat circuitry (amygdala, insula, dorsal ACC) becomes overactive.
Regulatory pathways (medial and ventrolateral PFC) are weakened, impairing the ability to pause or reframe thoughts.

Physical Health Effects

Chronic stress from hostility elevates cortisol, leading to hypertension, immune suppression, and inflammation (Slavich & Irwin, 2014).
High hostility is associated with shortened telomeres—genetic markers of cellular aging (Epel et al., 2004).

Cognitive and Emotional Consequences

Verbal aggression trains the brain to anticipate conflict.
Social cognition areas (e.g., temporo-parietal junction) are impaired, reducing empathy.
This leads to shame, isolation, and emotional burnout.

Behavioural Looping

Hostility becomes self-reinforcing.
Without intervention (e.g., mindfulness, compassion training), this reactive loop becomes default.

Does Mode of Expression Matter? Internal, Whispered, or Out Loud

Internal Language (Inner Speech) Even silent thoughts have physiological effects. Inner insults activate Broca’s area (language production), mPFC, insula, and ACC—regions tied to emotion, evaluation, and internal imagery (Morin, 2011). The inner voice can wound.
Whispered Language Whispering adds bodily engagement. Facial muscles, breath control, and auditory feedback reinforce emotional tone. It more deeply encodes the insult into memory and physiology.
Spoken Aloud This engages full limbic arousal, motor speech areas, vagal inhibition, and relationship systems. It harms both speaker and listener, creating trauma loops in couples and families.

Harming the Ones We Love: Impact on Couples and Families

Demeaning language within close relationships undermines trust, co-regulation, and safety. It activates the listener’s amygdala, reduces oxytocin release, and leads to withdrawal, defensiveness, or aggression. Over time, it reshapes the relational brain toward mistrust (Siegel, 2012).

In children, verbal aggression is particularly harmful. Harsh verbal discipline has been linked to reduced neural sensitivity in threat-monitoring systems and increased inflammation (Miller & Chen, 2010). These children may grow up with heightened risk for depression, low self-worth, and chronic illness.

Compassionate speech, by contrast, facilitates co-regulation. It activates reward pathways (ventral striatum), releases oxytocin, and promotes emotional safety. Teaching families to shift from blame to curiosity can transform dynamics and support resilience.

Self-Talk as Self-Harm

Internal hostile speech is a form of psychological self-harm. Calling oneself “useless,” “unlovable,” or worse wires the brain to believe it. This activates the same stress systems as external abuse. Chronic self-criticism leads to:

Increased cortisol and inflammation (Lupien et al., 2009).
Reduced vagal tone and immune competence (McEwen, 1998).
Depression, anxiety, and social withdrawal (Gilbert, 2009).

Practices that develop inner compassion, like loving-kindness meditation or guided imagery, can rewire these circuits, increasing emotional flexibility and physiological resilience (Fredrickson et al., 2008).

Conclusion: The Ethical and Biological Power of Words

Words matter. Every word we speak or think sends signals to our brain, body, and relationships. Hostile language—whether directed inward or outward—activates the threat system, suppresses compassion, increases inflammation, and trains us toward disconnection. The effects are cumulative and embodied.

Reframing language is not merely a therapeutic suggestion; it is a biologically grounded imperative. Cultivating a language of care, curiosity, and courage can help rewire threat-driven minds into minds shaped by empathy and connection. As we change our words, we change our brains. And as we change our brains, we change our world.

References

Teicher, M. H., & Samson, J. A. (2016). Annual research review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12507

Tomoda, A., Suzuki, H., Rabi, K., Sheu, Y. S., Polcari, A., & Teicher, M. H. (2011). Reduced prefrontal cortical gray matter volume in young adults exposed to harsh corporal punishment. NeuroImage, 47(S1), S39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.079

Buchanan, T. W., Lutz, K., Mirz, M., & Lund, T. E. (2000). The amygdala plays a key role in processing emotionally charged language. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(23), RC99.

Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70.

Creswell, J. D., et al. (2007). Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69(6), 560–565.

Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 294–300.

Epel, E. S., et al. (2004). Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. PNAS, 101(49), 17312–17315.

Fredrickson, B. L., et al. (2008). Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1045.

Gilbert, P. (2009). The Compassionate Mind. London: Constable.

Gottman, J., & Gottman, J. (2017). The science of couples and family therapy: Behind the scenes at the Love Lab. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.

Kross, E., et al. (2009). When hurt leads to hate: Neural activity related to anger and aggression as a function of perceived intentionality. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(4), 377–386.

LeDoux, J. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.

Lupien, S. J., McEwen, B. S., Gunnar, M. R., & Heim, C. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 434–445.

McEwen, B. S. (1998). Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(3), 171–179.

McEwen, B. S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiological Reviews, 87(3), 873–904.

Miller, G. E., & Chen, E. (2010). Harsh family climate blunts neural sensitivity to threat and increases inflammation. Psychological Science, 21(7), 931–937.

Morin, A. (2011). Self-awareness part 2: Neuroanatomy and importance of inner speech. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12), 1004–1017.

Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032

O'Donovan, A., Pantell, M. S., Puterman, E., Dhabhar, F. S., Blackburn, E. H., Yaffe, K., ... & Epel, E. S. (2011). Cumulative inflammatory load is associated with short leukocyte telomere length in the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. PLoS ONE, 6(5), e19687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019687

Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers (3rd ed.). New York: Holt.

Siegel, D. J. (2012). The Developing Mind (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Siegel, D. J., & Hartzell, M. (2004). Parenting from the inside out: How a deeper self-understanding can help you raise children who thrive. New York, NY: Tarcher/Putnam

Slavich, G. M., & Irwin, M. R. (2014). From stress to inflammation and depression: A social signal transduction theory. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 774–815.

A Kinder Vocabulary for Surprises, Shocks and Outbursts

A curated list of emotionally safer, culturally warm, and often humorous expressions — designed to calm the nervous system, preserve dignity, and nurture our shared language.

❖ Classic British / Polite Exclamations

Blimey!
By golly!
Cor blimey!
Dear me!
Good grief!
Good heavens!
Gracious me!
I say!
Jeepers creepers!
Lawks!
Land sakes!
Mercy me!
My word!
Oh bother!
Oh crumbs!
Strewth!
Strike me pink!
Well blow me down!
Well I never!

❖ Whimsical, Old-Timey Alternatives

Balderdash!
Fiddlesticks!
Great Scott!
Heavens to Betsy! (borderline American, but widely used in Commonwealth speech)
Hokey pokey! (New Zealand origin — retained)
Jiminy Cricket! (Disney origin, but often used in 1950s Aussie households)
Jumpin’ Jehoshaphat! (borderline — replace with “Jumping wallabies!” below)
Leaping lizards! → Leaping lorikeets!
Poppycock!
Suffering succotash! → Suffering songbirds!

❖ Mild Aussie & Kiwi Expressions

Crikey!
Dingo’s breakfast!
Fair dinkum?!
Flamin’ Nora!
Flaming galahs!
Gosh!
Good on ya!
Ripper!
Stone the crows!
Strewth almighty!
What the dickens?
You’re kidding, mate!

❖ Nature or Object-Based Sayings

Bless the bees!
Blow me over with a feather!
Blooming bottlebrush!
By the gumtrees!
By the old kettle!
Crikey the cockatoos!
Great barrier reef!
Holy mushrooms!
Sweet eucalyptus!
Thunder and wombats!

❖ Quirky Personal Creations

Bananas and biscuits!
By the biscuit tin!
Cat’s pyjamas! → Cat’s whiskers!
Don’t that beat all! → Well that takes the lamington!
Jings, crivvens and help ma boab! (kept as a nod to Scottish-Aussie heritage)
Raining pineapple peels!
Snakes alive!
Twisting turnips!
Well butter my buttons!
Wombat waltz!

❖ Mindful or Curious Reframes

Ah, the mystery thickens!
Fascinating…
Huh… well now!
Hmm, I wonder what that’s about?
I did not see that coming.
Now that catches my attention.
Oh! Hello, change.
That’s interesting.
That’s a surprise to the system!
Well, isn’t that something.

❖ Literary or Old Theatre Style

Avaunt!
Egad!
Forsooth!
Hark!
Hold, what sorcery is this?
Marry!
Odds bodkins!
Tush!
What ho!
Zounds!

❖ Animal-Based Exclamations

Dancing dolphins!
Flaming ferrets!
Flying foxes!
Great galloping geese!
Holy hedgehogs!
Jumping jackrabbits! → Jumping wallabies!
Leaping lemurs! → Leaping lorikeets!
Swooping magpies!
Wombat waltz!

❖ Gentle Satire & Kind Reappraisal

Colour me intrigued.
Consider my socks knocked off.
Even Poirot might blink at that.
I’m fluffed and feathered!
That’s a kettle of interesting!
That’s a new twist in the jam roll!
That’s not in the rulebook of Tuesdays!
The plot chickens! → The plot thickens like cold porridge!
That turns my teacup upside down.
That’s one for the memory banks.

Do we really need the Polyvagal Theory?

1. Does Polyvagal Theory Have a Falsifiability Problem?

Yes.

Stephen Porges’ Polyvagal Theory proposes that the vagus nerve has two branches — an older dorsal branch (freeze/shutdown) and a newer ventral branch (social engagement/calm).
It explains behaviours like fight, flight, freeze, shutdown, and social connection based on neuroception (unconscious detection of safety/danger) influencing the autonomic nervous system (ANS).

Problem:

It is difficult to falsify (i.e., impossible to definitively prove wrong through experiment).
Many observations it explains could also be explained by other mechanisms (e.g., classic sympathetic/parasympathetic balance, HPA axis dynamics).
The evidence for distinct dorsal vs ventral vagal pathways in humans remains controversial and indirect — it is inferred from anatomy and physiology, not clearly isolated experimentally.

In short: Polyvagal Theory is elegant, insightful, and clinically useful — but it lacks strong falsifiability and thus sits more like a working model or hypothesis rather than settled science.

2. Are the Core Issues Also Fully Explained by the HPA Axis Understanding?

Broadly, yes — and in a more testable, evolutionary consistent way.
Let’s break it down:

What is the HPA Axis?

Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal axis.
Governs stress response:

Threat detected → Hypothalamus triggers → Pituitary signals → Adrenal glands release cortisol.

Cortisol and other glucocorticoids regulate:

Energy mobilization
Inflammation control
Memory and alertness
Emotion regulation over time (because cortisol affects brain areas like the amygdala and hippocampus)

How the HPA Axis Covers What Polyvagal Theory Addresses:

Polyvagal Concept

HPA Axis + Classic ANS Explanation

Fight or flight (sympathetic activation)

Acute stress response via adrenaline/noradrenaline, plus early cortisol surge

Freeze or collapse (dorsal vagal shutdown)

Extreme threat can trigger parasympathetic dominance (via classic vagal mechanisms) + cortisol dysregulation

Social engagement (ventral vagal system)

Safety and attachment modulate cortisol levels down + increase oxytocin, serotonin, vagal tone (no need for special "ventral vagal" concept)

Neuroception (unconscious threat detection)

Amygdala and hippocampus circuitry rapidly detects danger and initiates HPA and ANS responses automatically

Thus, without invoking a special new "polyvagal" system,
the classical HPA axis and autonomic pathways already explain:

How we detect threat unconsciously
How our bodies react with fight/flight/freeze
How we socially engage when safe
How chronic stress dysregulates emotions, inflammation, and cognition

3. So What's the Bottom Line?

Aspect

Polyvagal Theory

HPA Axis Understanding

Strengths

Captures the felt experience of safety/danger with rich clinical language

Directly testable, grounded in classic evolutionary and biological research

Weaknesses

Not easily falsifiable; ventral/dorsal distinction remains anatomically debated

Can seem less "story-rich"; needs synthesis with attachment/social neuroscience for full picture

Clinical Use

Useful metaphor and intervention frame (esp. for trauma-sensitive work)

Strong empirical basis for understanding stress, resilience, healing

4. My Synthesis

When teaching or working therapeutically, you might say:

Polyvagal Theory gives us vivid metaphors (like "neuroception of safety" and "ventral vagal connection") — useful for clients and for crafting interventions focused on safeness.
But the HPA axis understanding remains scientifically firmer, and you can fully explain the same issues (fight/flight/freeze/social engagement) through well-established biological systems.
Thus, integrate the useful language of Polyvagal ideas, but anchor your scientific explanations in HPA axis, ANS dynamics, and evolutionary neuroscience (e.g., Panksepp, Sapolsky).

This approach stays scientifically grounded while remaining therapeutically creative and compassionate.

References for Further Reading

Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory. Norton.
Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers (3rd ed.). Holt Paperbacks.
Herman, J. P. et al. (2016). Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical stress response. Comprehensive Physiology, 6(2), 603-621.
Thayer, J. F., & Lane, R. D. (2009). Claude Bernard and the heart-brain connection: Further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(2), 81–88.

When Family Feels Far - 8 Compassionate Practices for Loneliness and Reconnection

“If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other.” — Mother Teresa

In modern life, many carry the quiet ache of loneliness. For some, it’s the physical absence of family; for others, the pain runs deeper — estrangement from children, a lack of closeness, or the fading of meaningful bonds.
This experience is more common than we think — and more painful than we often admit.
But loneliness is not a life sentence. When approached with kindness and the wisdom of compassion, new pathways open — pathways of inner warmth, external connection, and belonging that honours your worth.
The following eight compassionate practices draw from psychology, neuroscience, and the heart of Compassion-Focused Therapy (CFT), inviting you to cultivate strength, connection, and peace — whether family is near or far.

1. Strengthening Self-Reliance Through Compassionate Inner Dialogue
The practice:
• Start each morning by placing your hand gently over your heart or stomach and saying: “I am here for me.”
• Make one choice today that supports your wellbeing — whether it's taking a walk, eating nourishing food, or simply resting.
The emotional truth:
When we feel alone, the voice in our mind can become harsh: “No one’s there for me. I have to do everything myself.” This survival-driven voice needs balancing. Not with toxic positivity — but with a compassionate inner coach.
Compassion to self means honouring your strength and offering kindness to the parts of you that are tired, uncertain, or hurting.
The neuroscience:
Paul Gilbert’s model reminds us that self-reassurance activates the soothing system, helping downregulate threat responses in the brain (Gilbert, 2014). Small, consistent gestures of warmth toward ourselves build emotional safety.

2. Creating a “Chosen Family” as an Act of Compassion for Others
The practice:
• Identify one person in your life who makes you feel safe, seen, or uplifted. Write or speak your appreciation to them.
• Say yes to community: a spiritual group, nature walk, or volunteering opportunity.
The emotional truth:
When blood ties feel distant, we can still cultivate intentional relationships—ones built on kindness, shared values, and mutual support. Reaching out is not neediness; it is courage.
Compassion for others begins with the gentle willingness to connect, to be available, and to give care—even in small, everyday ways.
Try this mantra: “May I offer warmth to others, and may I be open to receiving warmth in return.”

3. Valuing Your Resilience—While Letting Yourself Be Held
The practice:
• Write a short timeline of challenges you’ve overcome—and what strengths helped you survive.
• Let yourself receive help or comfort without guilt. Even a kind look, a warm voice, or a meal shared counts.
The emotional truth:
You’ve likely had to be strong for a very long time. But true resilience isn’t about doing it all alone—it’s about knowing when to soften and be held.
Let compassion in. Let it reach you. Whether it comes from a friend, a stranger, a therapist, or nature—you are worthy of receiving care.
The psychology:
Compassion received (even imagined) helps regulate the HPA axis and activate the parasympathetic nervous system (Kirby, Tellegen, & Steindl, 2017). Letting others care for you is not weakness—it’s wise.

4. Embracing Independence with Self-Compassion, Not Self-Criticism
The practice:
• Celebrate one thing you managed on your own today—even if small.
• When something feels hard, speak kindly to yourself: “It makes sense that this is difficult. I’m doing the best I can.”
The emotional truth:
Independence often emerges from necessity. But being independent doesn’t mean you must be invulnerable.
Compassion to self is about releasing perfectionism and embracing your limits with grace.
Visualise: You, holding yourself like you would a small child, saying: “You don’t have to carry it all today.”

5. Deepening the Meaning of Every Relationship You Hold Dear
The practice:
• Reach out to someone with one sincere expression of affection: “You matter to me.”
• Write a gratitude list—not just of people, but of moments of connection (a smile, a shared story, a kind gesture).
The emotional truth:
Without close family, the relationships we do have often carry deeper meaning. That’s not a flaw—it’s a gift of the heart.
Offer love freely, without demand. And remember: Compassion for others strengthens the warmth within ourselves.
CFT perspective:
Offering compassion outward fuels our own sense of meaning and worth. Connection becomes a two-way street of shared humanity.

6. Finding Peace in Solitude While Staying Open to Connection
The practice:
• Create a quiet corner of beauty in your home—a chair by the window, a candle, a soft blanket.
• Use solitude as a time to reflect, not to ruminate. Let it be nourishing, not punishing.
The emotional truth:
Solitude is different from loneliness. One can feel spacious; the other, suffocating.
When we meet solitude with compassionate curiosity, it becomes a friend. A place of reconnection with self. But stay open: we are also wired for connection, and it’s okay to long for more.
Try this inner message: “It’s okay to enjoy my own company, and it’s okay to long for closeness too.”

7. Adapting With Heart and Humanity
The practice:
• When something changes, pause and ask: “How can I respond to this with kindness toward myself and others?”
• Remember: even tears, frustration, or messiness are part of being adaptable.
The emotional truth:
Life asks us to change, often when we least feel ready. Those without family support often become masters of adaptation—but this doesn’t mean they stop hurting.
Let your emotional truth be valid. Let your adaptability include self-soothing, asking for help, or even saying no.
Compassion to self means recognising that flexibility is strength, but exhaustion is real too.

8. Opening to Deep, Soulful Connection—At Your Own Pace
The practice:
• Write down three qualities you want in a nourishing relationship. Then ask: “Where am I already offering these qualities?”
• Join a circle, group, or activity that nourishes your values, not just your schedule.
The emotional truth:
Loneliness often comes from a hunger not just for company—but for mutual understanding and emotional presence.
The deepest longing is often for connection that feels safe, attuned, and warm. That kind of connection is possible—even late in life, even when past wounds remain.
Receive this: “It’s never too late to be loved as you are. It’s never too late to matter to someone.”

Final Words: You Belong Here
Dear reader, you are not invisible. You are not alone in this longing. Your life—without close family ties—is not a failure, but a path of brave resilience, quiet hope, and the possibility of new beginnings.
In Compassion-Focused Therapy, we often say:
“The courage to face suffering with wisdom, strength, and care is the essence of compassion.”
May you know this courage. May you offer yourself care. And may you discover that even in the absence of family, your presence is enough—and deeply needed in this world.

References
Gilbert, P. (2014). The compassionate mind: A new approach to life's challenges. New Harbinger.
Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L., & Steindl, S. R. (2017). A meta-analysis of compassion-based interventions: Current state of knowledge and future directions. Behavior Therapy, 48(6), 778–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2017.06.003
Long, C. R., & Averill, J. R. (2003). Solitude: An exploration of benefits of being alone. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(1), 21–44.
Rutter, M. (2012). Resilience as a dynamic concept. Development and Psychopathology, 24(2), 335–344.
Siegel, D. J. (2010). The mindful therapist: A clinician's guide to mindsight and neural integration. W.W. Norton & Company.
Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. Columbia University Press.
Copyright Thinking Healthy - John Julian